I am not seeing what your points have to do with the original discussion, which has to do with corporate entities.
What does the assertion that a group can achieve greater intelligence than separate individuals have to do with whether that group should get additional legal recognition and privilege? What does the demonstrated expertise of people in a business have to do with the legal treatment of activities those people may engage in outside of their business? What do the advantages of a free market have to do with granting of additional legal privilege to a business group, and whether they should be able to apply that privilege outside of running their business? How do your economic arguments apply at all to a not for profit?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 10:21 am (UTC)What does the assertion that a group can achieve greater intelligence than separate individuals have to do with whether that group should get additional legal recognition and privilege? What does the demonstrated expertise of people in a business have to do with the legal treatment of activities those people may engage in outside of their business? What do the advantages of a free market have to do with granting of additional legal privilege to a business group, and whether they should be able to apply that privilege outside of running their business? How do your economic arguments apply at all to a not for profit?